You Want My Internet? Come And Take It!

by Keith Johnson

 What, me worry?

              Alfred E. Newman

It’s a travesty of a mockery of a sham!

The careless abuse of talking and writing has forced our great leaders to step in and stem the rising tide of political discourse.

All you people who have an opinion should be ashamed of yourselves.  Did you stop to think that maybe your shared thoughts might be at odds with the agenda our betters have planned for us?  I didn’t think so.  Well they showed you, didn’t they? The hand that feeds has now decided that you have had too many treats.  So now, if you want more, you’re going to have to beg!  Bad dog!

But did you ever try to take a garden hose to two dogs mating in the street?  Does that stop them?  No!  They just move on down the road and look for another spot to hook up.  And that may be precisely what we are going to have to do.

Forgive me for making light of the serious threat to our first amendment right of freedom of speech but I have been preparing myself for this eventuality for quite some time and, quite frankly, I’m not too worried about it. 

Last week the House overwhelmingly passed the “Cyber Security Bill”.  What that means to the future of the Internet as we know it has yet to be seen.  But surely we are already starting to see signs that the world, as a whole, is tightening the screws on websites they deem as subversive or hateful.  Many providers are now starting to filter content and blocking access to various political sites like the one this article is appearing on.

But this should not surprise anyone.  Ever since the 15th century, when Guttenberg invented the moveable type printing press, governments have stepped in to censor and restrict the spread of information.  The Catholic Church, Europe’s political entity of the day, realized that the printing press was a major threat to their power and influence over the people and required that all published material get their stamp of approval before being disseminated.  But the volume and speed at which texts were published proved very taxing and they soon realized that they were fighting a losing battle.  And that’s the fate that has befallen this latest group of paranoid control freaks.  They have opened “Pandora’s Box”, and once that happens, it’s hard to get the lid back on.

The Internet was originally intended to be used as a worldwide wiretap to pry into the lives and thoughts of the public.  But what started out as an intelligence-gathering tool of the Pentagon soon evolved into a populist alternative to the mainstream press.  It proved to be a useful and effective mechanism for countering government propaganda as well as serving as a valuable resource for spreading truth, exposing corruption and distributing previously suppressed knowledge.

I don’t suspect that the Internet will ever be completely shut down.  Too much commerce depends on it.  Businesses rely on the Internet for sales of their goods and services as well as providing a convenient way for their customers to pay bills and make transactions. Certainly the government and the mainstream media rely on the Internet to spread their lies and disinformation. 

So where does that lead us?  Licensing is already being considered under the guise of national security.  Therefore, I expect to see a creeping incremental abolishment of dissent and political commentary as activists and journalists are prohibited from using government regulated infrastructure to disseminate their views and opinions. 

And what is to become of the current crop of freedom fighters and truth seekers?  Do we disappear quietly into the night?  Do we close up shop and concede to defeat?  No!  We do what we always do when oppressive government intervenes to stifle dissent among its population:  we go underground!

For nearly two decades the government has produced millions of “information addicts”.  Of course this was their plan all along.  As any good drug dealer will tell you, the best way to develop repeat business is to get your customer hooked on free product.  Then, once they are hooked, you start charging them.  That’s exactly what they intend to do here.  Licensing and fines will no doubt generate millions, if not billions, of dollars of revenue.  But what I don’t think they have factored into the equation is that many of these “information addicts” will reject the quality of product the government is pushing and will force them into the streets to find the “good stuff”.

All those avatars and usernames will start growing legs and sprouting arms and, as a result, will create a whole new underground culture.  Graffiti artists will cover walls with political messages.  Banner hangs will start appearing everywhere off freeway overpasses.  Coffee houses and bars will take on a whole new life as meeting places for writers and political pundits.  Private libraries and bookstores will start popping up everywhere carrying material that cannot be found on the web.  Cadres of students will flood the streets with pamphlets and flyers, leaflets and independent newspapers.  Activists will start appearing in the backgrounds of “on the scene” news broadcasts hoisting signs and shouting over the voices of reporters.  Street pulpits will appear on the corners of major cities.  Small theaters will host viewings of documentaries and other films carrying a political statement.  Fax machines will start going back into operation to disseminate information.  Mobile pirate radio stations will roam down city streets trying to keep one step ahead of the FCC.  Short-wave radio will become a popular medium to collect information on world affairs from foreign broadcasts.  The possibilities are endless.

We will witness the resurgence of the underground press that flourished in the 50’s and 60’s when gonzo journalists like Hunter S. Thompson and Tom Wolfe wrote for underground publications that made the medium popular.  But the new movement will have an advantage over those pioneers.  All of our dormant computers and printers will come back to life as miniature printing presses pumping out volumes of literature and burning thousands upon thousands of DVD’s and CD’s.

The unintended consequences of restricting access to the Internet could prove to be very counter-productive to the government and the mainstream press.  Once an underground movement begins it spreads like wildfire, especially among the young.  The street level actions will prove to be an ideal recruiting ground for previously apathetic youths who will be attracted to the rebellious aspects of an underground movement.   But, once they are educated, they will grow to embrace the noble ideals that the movement stands for and they will become a force unto themselves.

The best example of how this kind of movement can succeed has it’s roots in post-Stalin Russia and Poland when poets, musicians and writers gathered in town squares and passed along printed Samizdat: censored publications that the government considered subversive and a threat to their national security.  These materials were spread from person to person in a covert fashion.  Many of these documents were hand written and copied using blotting paper due to the unavailability of typewriters and printing presses that were strictly regulated by the state.  They certainly faced greater challenges than we do now.   Yet, despite all the forces working against them, they managed to lay a foundation for the grassroots resistance movement of the 80’s when, using FAX machines, information began to spread prolifically and contributed immensely to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

But none of these victories come easy.  One notable Russian activist, Andrei Mironov was imprisoned as a thought criminal during this time and was considered “worse than a murderer” by the KGB.  His crime?  Listening to short-wave radio, reading foreign literature and engaging in conversations with people outside the Soviet Union about life under that totalitarian regime.  Another hero of the time was Vladamir Bukovsky who was persecuted for organizing demonstrations to protest the imprisonment of political dissidents and later exposing the psychiatric torture of detainees in Soviet gulags.  Bukovsky spent a total of 12 years behind bars for his political activities but emerged as a major political force in the post-Soviet years.

Certainly we too should expect to someday fall victim to this kind of persecution.  Our own recent history should be evidence of that. In the UK of the 60’s, police constantly harassed the underground press at every opportunity.  But this ended up backfiring on them and made the movement even more relevant and popular.  Counter-culture journalist Mick Ferren recalls that the police efforts “focused attention, stiffened resolve, and tended to confirm that what we were doing was considered dangerous to the establishment”.  And right here in the U.S., during the 70’s,  the FBI set up fake newspapers and publications like The Longhorn Tale at UT Austin to counter and discredit what they considered to be radical networks of leftist journalists and activists.  They also conducted surveillance on these groups and sent in provocateurs to disrupt their activities, discredit them and portray them as violent subversives.  One such operation occurred in 1970 when the FBI, on orders of the Nixon Administration, staged a faux-riot at Disneyland Park in Anaheim to discredit the anti-Vietnam movement.

The same stuff is going on to this very day; we should be used to it by now.  The government has been reading our Emails, logged our web traffic and no doubt has an individual profile of each and every one of us who have dared speak out against them.  Perhaps, in some ways, we should be grateful that they have created an environment that forces us to push ourselves away from the keyboards and their prying eyes.

I’m not suggesting that we hold a wake for the Internet.  It’s not going away any time soon.  And even if it does, there will always be clever “Techies” and “Hackers” finding ways to keep us online.  But while we still have the Internet in its present form, we should be downloading and copying as much information as we can.   That information will become a commodity.  It might also be a good idea to start stocking up on paper and blank discs (while they’re still cheap)…just in case.

So while we all fear the worst, let us take comfort in knowing that we always have alternatives to spread the word and continue our education.  We can’t be stopped.  We will be seen and we will be heard.  We’ll find a way.

So this is my message to “Big Brother”:  Do you really want to cut off your nose to spite your face?  Are you prepared for the repercussions?  Are you equipped to police and monitor all those bodies on the street?  Well?  Are You?  Go ahead…make my day.   I dare you!  You want my Internet?  Come and take it!…I could use the exercise.

Published in: on February 9, 2010 at 2:38 pm  Comments (13)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

13 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. The primal drive to be free certainly does seem irrepressible.

    Tyrants come and go.
    They rise and fall.
    But the struggle for liberty never dies.

    People always find a way to carry on the fight, even right under the noses of their oppressors.

    Surrender is out of the question.

    Liberty & Justice,


  2. I’m suddenly encouraged for the first time in many weeks. Thanks for the article!

  3. It’s a sad day we’re living seeing our most treasured basic right of free speech eroding away. The one true right that an American was born with because of the blood spilled by their fore fathers/mothers. Yes, the underground will rise but I’m afraid the real uprising will not come for a few generations. Once people are suppressed and striped of the pride, they will be intimidated into controlled masses. Their children will be the ones to revolt. Americans today are mostly overweight, uninformed, uneducated to the true ways of the world, hypnotized by propaganda and Disney World. I’ll see you in the compound friends where you and I will be able to talk about the good old days, being very careful not to be overheard. “God Speed USA”

  4. Well said, Alfred. Thanks for your your catching optimism and the good ideas. The Matrix is dying. Long live the Matrix!

  5. To make the US Constitution meaningless the govt there is intent on deleting your first two Amendments and so is moving on both those fronts

    Australia also is becoming more repressive in the area of net regulation, and keeping in tandem with the US govt has for some years now required people to justify to the police why one needed a firearm, and to register it with them, and then adhere to all the rest of the onerous compliance b/s, all of it designed to preposition the State to sweep down on all firearms holders as the bankster oppression increases.

    For this shoe to fall the govt in Australia allowed the massacre at Port Arthur back in 96 to happen, where some 35 people were expertly gunned down, allegedly by a simpleton whose knowledge of firearms was limited to shooting an air gun.

  6. Before the Internet, there were BBSs — electronic Bulletin Board Systems. Private individuals added a (or several) phone lines to their homes, and they attached a (or several) dial-up modems to a (or several) computers. The software was text only, for posting and reading information. Gradually, the ability to upload and to download files was added. Finally, nets of linked BBSs developed, with (typically) daily synchronization.

    No ISPs — no central censorship. The only censorship was imposed by the operators (called “sysops”) of each individual BBS. If you didn’t like the policies of one BBS, you could dial-up any of several other BBSs.

    Let’s start working out the details of how to set up a decentralized, alternative Internet.

    • Good stuff, Martin, but wouldn’t the phone companies simply filter out ‘unlicensed’ digital signals?

      • Dial-up modems are analog, not digital. Phone companies could filter out the tones used by 28.8, 33.6 and 56K modems, however they can’t block the tones used by 14.4K and below, because they are also used by fax machines. Business would never put up with it.

        Using fax machines, Solidarity brought down the communist government of Poland. Strikes and demonstrations that broke out all over the country simultaneously appeared to be spontaneous.

        Internal analog computer modems are for both data and fax. Just as you can use a terminal program to exchange data with another computer, such as a BBS, you can send and receive faxes.

        Some operating systems, such as Windows XP, have fax software built in. There are also inexpensive — and sometimes free — fax programs that can be installed. You can scan in a document or compose one in a word processing program and fax it directly from your computer.

        In the early 80s, we old-timer geeks ran and accessed BBSs with 300-baud modems on Commodore 64s and similar “state-of-the-art” computers of that time. There’s no reason that we couldn’t do the same with current computers at 14.4K.

        What would be the final form of the alternative Internet? Would there be multiple alternatives in use at the same time? What standards would the alternative Internet(s) use?

        I don’t have a comprehensive plan worked out. I don’t claim to be capable of doing so. This is not an ego trip on my part.

        I hope to provoke people to start preparing now for the certain future crack-down.

        I hope to stimulate people to come together and hash out the technologies that we can implement to render centralized Internet censorship incapable of shutting us down.

    • Just use proxies vpn’s. i have an off-shore server i vpn to. I also use ssh inside the vpn. dpi that!

      • You seem to have missed the the drift of the article. ISPs, either on their own or by government order, are blocking or taking down “dangerous” Web sites. The purpose of the Cybersecurity Act and similar measures in other countries is to further “defang” the Internet.

        Even though the use of VPNs, proxies and “anonymizers” like Tor, increase personal security, they will not make it possible to access blocked or taken down Web sites.

        They also will not bypass laws requiring Web sites and Internet users to be licensed by the government.

        It is the Internet itself, as we know it, that is under attack. The issue here is how to maintain the free flow of information, as the clamp down on the Internet continues to worsen.

  7. This realm of, material dies, and so will the net.
    Only your spirit is forever, even when in use by others, dont worry to much, the waves are rolling, and this time the king will not be protected.

  8. “The hand that feeds has now decided…”

    The hand that feeds? WE, People are the hand that feeds!

    Tptb have squeezed as much blood as they could in taxes. Every innovation in high tech, has been done with OUR money.

    In fact, the Internet belongs to US, THE PEOPLE!!

  9. They want out Internet & also access to our cell phone calls. When does it end & when do each of us take a stand?

    Finally, someone just wrote a great book on a small town in America that does stand up to federal tyranny & ends up starting the 2nd American Revolution.

    Must read if you want to see what’s going to happen in 2010.

    “When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty……” Thomas Jefferson

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 522 other followers

%d bloggers like this: